Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Workplace Risk Associated Activities: Case Study of Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN)

Received: 31 July 2024     Accepted: 28 August 2024     Published: 20 September 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In the study of the Workplace Risk Associated Activities, Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN) Case Study, a descriptive survey research design was adopted. The research method used for the primary data collection was structured closed and opened–ended questionnaire created with Epi-Info version7 based on the research aim and objectives of the study. The collected data was analysed using Epi-Info version7. Results indicated that: high number of person-to-person contacts (83.3%), high number of respondents/staff encounter with sharp materials during work (55.7%), presence of snakes (3.8%) and rodents (39.2%) In or around offices, presence of mosquitoes bite (43.0%), low number of immunized respondents/staff (24.4%), low number of trained respondents/staff on workplace risks (33.3%), working space (67.1%), job schedule orientation (66.7%), respondents/staff that cover their mouth when coughing or sneezing (66.6%) and respondents/staff that wash hands before eating in the office (89.6%). These trends amount to high risks with high likelihood and consequences calling for urgent attention. Though the organization scored high (98.7%) in assess control by making sure that all offices had lock and keys and were locked when leaving office, in switching off electrical appliances when leaving office (94.8%), washing hands before eating in office (89.6%) and in work environment cleanliness and conduciveness (88.5%) yet more hard work is needed to enable attainment of 100% in all workplace safety areas. The logistic regression analysis of training (outcome variable) and covariates: washing hands before eating in the office, covering mouth when coughing or sneezing and switching off light when leaving office indicated significant results (p<0.5) with likelihood of about 90.0% There are high workplace risks associated activities in MLSCN calling for urgent attention.

Published in American Journal of Health Research (Volume 12, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12
Page(s) 124-135
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Workplace, Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria, Staff, Risk Associated Activity

References
[1] Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (2003). Infection at work: Controlling the risks, ACDP. 25.
[2] Aswathappa, K. (2000) Human Resource Management Practice, Kogan Page, 6th Ed.
[3] Beck, U. (1986/2003): Akockázat-társadalom–Útegymásik modernitásba (Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity). Századvégkiadó. Budapest.
[4] Bonss, W. (1998): Bizonytalanság, kockázatésveszély (uncertainty, Risk and Hazard). Replika. Vol. IX, No. 31–32, pp. 45–62.
[5] Braunné, FK (2011): Kockázatmegosztásamagán-ésközszférakapcsolatrendszerében (Risk sharing in the Relationships of the Private and Public sectors). PhD Thesis. PhD school of financial Management, faculty of Economics, university of Pécs.
[6] Cancelliere, C., Cassidy, J. D., Ammendolia, C.. Are workplace health promotion programs effective at improving presenteeism in workers? a systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the literature. BMC Public Health 11, 395 (2011).
[7] Clark, M. J. O. (1999) Nursing in the Community. USA. Appleton and Lafe. Henderson, V. and Nite, G. (1978). Principles and Practices of Nursing. (6th Ed) NewYork. Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc.
[8] Garaczi, I. (2013): Kockázatimodel lekéstársadalmimozgások (Risk Models and Movements in society). Gazdaságetika. No. 5.
[9] Goetzel RZ, Schechter D, Ozminkowski RJ, Marmet PF, Tabrizi MJ. (2007). Promising practices in employer health and productivity management efforts: findings from a bench marking study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 49: 111-30.
[10] Goetzel RZ and Ozminkowski RJ (2008). The Health and Cost Benefits of Work Site Health-Promotion Programs Annual Review of Public Health 29(1): 303-23.
[11] International Labour Conference (70th: 1984: Geneva, Switzerland); International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO; 1984.
[12] Knight, f. H. (1921/1964): Risk, uncertainty and Profit. Sentry Press. New York.
[13] Lányi, A. (2011): Akockázattársadalomvége (The End of Risk society). Kultúraés Közösség. Vol. IV, No. 2011/3, pp. 7‒13.
[14] Lee Lung-Fei, (1978), Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables, International Economic Review, 19, (2), 415-33.
[15] Loeppke R. (2008). The value of health and the power of prevention. Int J Workplace Health Manag.; 1 (2): 95–108.
[16] Luhmann, N. (1990): DieWissenschaftvonder Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: suhrkamp.
[17] Mazouni M. H. (2008). pourune Meilleure Approchedu Management des Risques: Dela Modélisation Ontologiquedu Processus Accidentelau Système Interatifd’AideàlaDécision, Thèsede Doctoratdel’Institut National Polytechnique deLorraine, Universitéde Nancy.
[18] Naliaka V. W. and Namusonge G. S. (2015) Role of Inventory Management on Competitive Advantage among Manufacturing Firms in Kenya: A Case Study of Unga Group Limited. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 5(5).
[19] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard 1998a.
[20] Osilla KC, Van Busum K, Schnyer C, Larkin JW, Eibner C, Mattke S. Systematic review of the impact of worksite wellness programs. The American Journal of Managed Care, 01 Feb 2012, 18(2): e68-81. PMID: 22435887.
[21] Reich, M. R., & Okubo, T. (1992). Protecting Workers' Health in the Third World National and International Strategies. Auburn House.
[22] Renn O. (1992) Concept of Risk: A classification.
[23] Renn, O. (1998): Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 49-71.
[24] Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thorn hill, A. (2009) Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson, New York.
[25] Schulte PA (2005). Characterizing the burden of occupational injury and disease. J Occup Environ Med.; 47(6): 607– 622.
[26] Tsai M. C., Lai K. H., Lloyd A. E., Lin H. J., (2012). The dark side of logistics out sourcing unravelling the potential risks leading to failed relationships, Transportation Research PartE (48), 178-189.
[27] Tuncel G., Alpan G., (2010). Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks: A case study, Computers in Industry (61), 250–259.
[28] Yang Y. C. (2011). Risk management of Taiwan’s maritime supply chain security, Safety Science (49), 382–393.
[29] California Occupational Health Program Act, 2 Stat. (section number), (1992).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ofodeme, C. N., Elendu, H. N., Edeh, I., Idume, O. N., Ahunanya, M. I., et al. (2024). Workplace Risk Associated Activities: Case Study of Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN). American Journal of Health Research, 12(5), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ofodeme, C. N.; Elendu, H. N.; Edeh, I.; Idume, O. N.; Ahunanya, M. I., et al. Workplace Risk Associated Activities: Case Study of Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN). Am. J. Health Res. 2024, 12(5), 124-135. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ofodeme CN, Elendu HN, Edeh I, Idume ON, Ahunanya MI, et al. Workplace Risk Associated Activities: Case Study of Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN). Am J Health Res. 2024;12(5):124-135. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12,
      author = {Christian Nnaemeka Ofodeme and Humphrey Ndubueze Elendu and Ini Edeh and Ogbonna Nwachi Idume and Miriam Ijeoma Ahunanya and Chioma Nkechi Nnama},
      title = {Workplace Risk Associated Activities: Case Study of Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN)
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Health Research},
      volume = {12},
      number = {5},
      pages = {124-135},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajhr.20241205.12},
      abstract = {In the study of the Workplace Risk Associated Activities, Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN) Case Study, a descriptive survey research design was adopted. The research method used for the primary data collection was structured closed and opened–ended questionnaire created with Epi-Info version7 based on the research aim and objectives of the study. The collected data was analysed using Epi-Info version7. Results indicated that: high number of person-to-person contacts (83.3%), high number of respondents/staff encounter with sharp materials during work (55.7%), presence of snakes (3.8%) and rodents (39.2%) In or around offices, presence of mosquitoes bite (43.0%), low number of immunized respondents/staff (24.4%), low number of trained respondents/staff on workplace risks (33.3%), working space (67.1%), job schedule orientation (66.7%), respondents/staff that cover their mouth when coughing or sneezing (66.6%) and respondents/staff that wash hands before eating in the office (89.6%). These trends amount to high risks with high likelihood and consequences calling for urgent attention. Though the organization scored high (98.7%) in assess control by making sure that all offices had lock and keys and were locked when leaving office, in switching off electrical appliances when leaving office (94.8%), washing hands before eating in office (89.6%) and in work environment cleanliness and conduciveness (88.5%) yet more hard work is needed to enable attainment of 100% in all workplace safety areas. The logistic regression analysis of training (outcome variable) and covariates: washing hands before eating in the office, covering mouth when coughing or sneezing and switching off light when leaving office indicated significant results (p<0.5) with likelihood of about 90.0% There are high workplace risks associated activities in MLSCN calling for urgent attention.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Workplace Risk Associated Activities: Case Study of Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN)
    
    AU  - Christian Nnaemeka Ofodeme
    AU  - Humphrey Ndubueze Elendu
    AU  - Ini Edeh
    AU  - Ogbonna Nwachi Idume
    AU  - Miriam Ijeoma Ahunanya
    AU  - Chioma Nkechi Nnama
    Y1  - 2024/09/20
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12
    T2  - American Journal of Health Research
    JF  - American Journal of Health Research
    JO  - American Journal of Health Research
    SP  - 124
    EP  - 135
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8796
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20241205.12
    AB  - In the study of the Workplace Risk Associated Activities, Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria (MLSCN) Case Study, a descriptive survey research design was adopted. The research method used for the primary data collection was structured closed and opened–ended questionnaire created with Epi-Info version7 based on the research aim and objectives of the study. The collected data was analysed using Epi-Info version7. Results indicated that: high number of person-to-person contacts (83.3%), high number of respondents/staff encounter with sharp materials during work (55.7%), presence of snakes (3.8%) and rodents (39.2%) In or around offices, presence of mosquitoes bite (43.0%), low number of immunized respondents/staff (24.4%), low number of trained respondents/staff on workplace risks (33.3%), working space (67.1%), job schedule orientation (66.7%), respondents/staff that cover their mouth when coughing or sneezing (66.6%) and respondents/staff that wash hands before eating in the office (89.6%). These trends amount to high risks with high likelihood and consequences calling for urgent attention. Though the organization scored high (98.7%) in assess control by making sure that all offices had lock and keys and were locked when leaving office, in switching off electrical appliances when leaving office (94.8%), washing hands before eating in office (89.6%) and in work environment cleanliness and conduciveness (88.5%) yet more hard work is needed to enable attainment of 100% in all workplace safety areas. The logistic regression analysis of training (outcome variable) and covariates: washing hands before eating in the office, covering mouth when coughing or sneezing and switching off light when leaving office indicated significant results (p<0.5) with likelihood of about 90.0% There are high workplace risks associated activities in MLSCN calling for urgent attention.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections